Silicon Valley Business Journal Corporate Philanthropy Awards 2020, Articles E

We understand your anxiety :-) However, the decision on manuscript acceptance depends on several factors, such as availability and responsiveness of peer reviewers and the extent of revisions recommended. Does this mean a rejection letter is about to come? !1997 F350 XLT 4x4 Crew Cab (4 door) 7.3 Liter V-8 Diesel Powerstroke, Automatic with overdrive, Dana 60 front axle, Weld Racing Wheels and Toyo Open Country Radials (tires and wheels cost $4500) only 66,000 original miles Located in Seattle Washington 98188 1 mile from Seatac AirportI . Until then, you may find it worthwhile to go through the following resources about journal statuses: Answered by Irfan Syed Research suggests that . For our last submission the decision took 25 days for which the editor apologized. How long does it take to publish a paper in Journal? Follow. Once the decision has been made to peer-review the paper, the choice of referees is made by the editor who has been assigned the manuscript, who will be handling other papers in the same field, in consultation with editors handling submissions in related fields when necessary. Production Our subeditors send authors the edited text for approval before it is typeset. edit the language for maximum clarity and precision for those in other disciplines. Can we write a courteous mail asking about the status change from 'Decision Made' to 'Under Consideration'? Most journals typically take around 4-12 weeks to share their final decision. The journal editor will probably make their final decision about your paper based on the changes you now make to the work, as well as the contents, its originality, and the way you write your cover letter. Please avoid repeating information that is already present in the abstract and introduction. So dont feel upset! Can airtags be tracked from an iMac desktop, with no iPhone? Elsevier is currently publishing not only the time to 1st decision and publication but also the CiteScore, Impact Factor, and Acceptance rate of their journals. Welcome to the Northern Ireland Assembly web site, which was set up to inform interested viewers of the day-to-day business and historical background of devolved Government in Northern Ireland. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. Although Nature editors go to every effort to ensure manuscripts are assessed fairly, Nature is not responsible for the conduct of its referees.Nature welcomes authors' suggestions for suitable independent referees (with their contact details), but editors are free to decide themselves who to use as referees. My paper was published in a journal in 2021 october. The EiC may have seen merits in your paper after all (or a fit, if that was the issue). [2] In any state, sovereignty is assigned to the person, body, or institution that has the ultimate authority over other people in order to establish a law or change . Decision pending means that the decision is pending.They havent decided yet. If the journal lowers its threshold for publication, its reputation will decline, devaluing the achievements of thousands of previously accepted authors. . This stage includes checks on authorship, competing interests, ethics approval and plagiarism. 2. Your IP: It's true that editorial rejections can be very rapid based on scope and perceived 'gee whiz' factor. Although many decisions appear clear-cut, others are necessarily based on subtle distinctions between papers, and referees or editors can sometimes make mistakes. Special care is given to papers whose authors native language is not English, and special attention is given to summary paragraphs. The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. Reviewers will assess the technical soundness and scientific validity of your methods, analysis and interpretation, all of which must be appropriate, properly conducted, ethically robust and fully supported by the data. Make sure that your arguments are backed by solid evidence. There isnt any secret code to deciphering the submission tracker. In light of such uncertainty, the threshold for reversing a decision must be set well above the level of 'noise' in the process: otherwise, decisions would simply go back and forth endlessly in a kind of Brownian motion. The paper is accepted for publication without any further changes required from the authors. All referees agree to Nature's conditions before Nature sends them a manuscript to assess. Answer (1 of 7): Most submissions are rejected by editors without review, and this should be fast - perhaps, two weeks (?). But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. Referees are chosen for the following reasons: Although Nature's editors themselves judge whether a paper is likely to interest readers outside its own immediate field, referees often give helpful advice, for example if the work described is not as significant as the editors thought or has undersold its significance. :-) So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education. What does the distribution of wait times for a editor decision look like for a manuscript submitted to Science or Nature? As opposed to an editor, a peer reviewer advises the researcher of how he would have conducted his research, and what research methods would have made a difference. Stage 2: Editor assigned. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? You could ask how soon they think they will answer, or give a deadline yourself, warning them that, after that deadline without having heard, you will submit the text to another publisher. This referees opinion must be satisfied for the manuscript to be published, but as this referee may not know about the field concerned, an endorsement in isolation from the other referee(s) would not constitute grounds for publication. This scheme only applies to original research Articles, and not to Review articles or to other published content. on 14 Jul, 2020, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. It only takes a minute to sign up. editor decision started under consideration. English Editing - Editage.com | Editage.jp | Editage.co.kr |SCI Editage.cn |publicao de artigos Editage.com.br | Editage.com.tw |Terms of UseforEnglish Editing Services. Asked by megha m The editor considers reviewer feedback and their own evaluation of the manuscript in order to reach a decision. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. Bulk update symbol size units from mm to map units in rule-based symbology. This, in turn, means that the status Awaiting decision refers to the decision that the editor will take about whether your paper will be sent for peer review or desk rejected. Authors should use the formatting guide section to ensure that the level, length and format (particularly the layout of figures and tables and any Supplementary Information) conforms with Nature's requirements, at submission and each revision stage. var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); volume5,page 917 (2002)Cite this article. However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. The Senior Editor then assesses the manuscript for its quality and perceived level of advance and then either recommends a reject decision or assigns peer reviewers. What does this mean and should I contact the editor? the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in PRX editors make every effort to arrive at a clear decision on the disposition of a manuscript within a reasonable time. EDIT: As Strongbad points out in a comment the term Awaiting Editors Decision strictly indicates that the paper has passed reviewers. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1002-917.