Jessica Alves Botched, Limpia De Huevo Yema Reventada Significado, Articles C

So whats so great about shooting at 135mm anyway? The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 includes a lens hood, lens pouch, front and rear lens caps, and a 1-year Rokinon manufacturer warranty. Pentax seems to have put more emphasis than others on keeping the resolution uniform all over the field. That is why when SLRs came along the 200mm became the big seller and the 135 was largely forgotten. We were surprised by just how much difference there was between these AI-powered image enlargers. I speak Japanese fluently, was a translator in Tokyo for 8 years and studied photography there for two years. It can isolate subject while being tack sharp with beautiful creamy bokeh when used at f2. USM works so quickly and accurately, it puts my 24-70/f2.8L to shame. Most of these APOs have F ratios around 6.5, and are unable to comprehend in their field of view large celestial objects such as the Andromeda galaxy, the North America nebula, and comets. I found this highly restrictive for shooting indoors where there was seldom enough distance between me with my camera and my subject(s). But you raise the exact point, that primes should be chosen with a 2x factor. What I see is a photographer who should maybe instead stick to the kit lens, and learn composition first. Beautiful portrait lens. Are you really using 135 a lot? My first shot was a section of the constellation Sagittarius that included the Lagoon Nebula, and Trifid Nebula. When attached to a DSLR camera with a full frame sensor, the lens offers a massive 15.5 x 10.6 field of view, or 18.8 across the diagonal. My goal for this article was to show some great example photos and share some ideas for projects this lens is a good fit for. We sell a wide variety of digital cameras from all the top brands like Canon, Nikon, Sony, Panasonic, Olympus, Fujifilm, Pentax, Leica, Samsung, and more. However, I am convinced that its large aperture and fast F ratio would perform exceptionally well in three color or narrow band H-alpha and OIII photography. "That is why when SLRs came along the 200mm became the big seller and the 135 was largely forgotten"Did you notice that this 135mm F2 lens on an APS-C camera is more or less equivalent to a 200mm F2.8 lens on an FF camera ?So this lens can be seen as the 200mm F2.8 lens for APS-C camera users. Using the lens's diaphragm interferes with the light path and results in diffraction spikes which I find unattractive. It turns out that this. http://www.idyll.com/laney2014 But for many of us, somewhere in between, are plenty of short to mid-tele lenses that will deliver solid service (in terms of subject separation) without carrying around still another kilo for the sake of more blur. Sharp, handy, strong colours and contrast. Also, I used to have a Nikon 180/2.8 ED IF AF and 300/4 ED IF AF. Also, when used as recommended, and properly guided at full camera resolution, they are all comparable to a field-corrected APO, producing perfect images from edge to edge which can be easily cropped 25% with no evidence of aberrations. Beware others critical comments here about how flat these images look, the author has chosen specific topics and viewpoints to highlight f2 with this lens, so see the wow review for what it is please and the negative comments need placing in context. If you're using or are looking to buy the Samyang or Rokinon 135mm F/2, please let me know what you're imaging with it or any questions you may have in the comment section below. It could really use an update to its coatings. Can I assume that this article applies only to full frame & not to micro four thirds? During the frigid months of winter, my motivation to spend over an hour setting up my complete deep-sky imaging rig dwindles. The best 200mm lens is precisely the older 200mm F4 SMC Takumar, which comes with the M42 camera thread, and requires the M42-EOS adapter. Youll never have to worry about losing your position just by touching the lens, but you can always tape the position down to be sure. AHAB. She doesn't look like she is there. Extrapolating from this, minimum recommended guidescope power is 120x for the 300mm telephoto, 80x for the 200mm, and 55x for the 135mm. Digital camera types . If anything the argument in favor of even smaller and lighter 85/1.4s (like the 600g Sigma DN) is stronger than ever, and I say that as someone that loves shooting at 135-150mm. Would you recommend a collar/support for the lens? The Canon is about as sharp as the Samyang, but it has some very slight chromatic aberration. Its fast f/2.0 maximum aperture is effective in low light and enables shallow depth of field control. Some of the primes have a special look to them, but only the 70-200 is indispensable. In the past, Ive covered a number of different lenses, from the Sigma 24mm F/1.4 to the Canon EF 300mm F/4L. But I would argue that a 135mm F2 lens produces even greater bokeh, thanks to the long focal length that compresses the background far more than the 85mm lens. Let's the games begin! Since I am interested in wide field astrophotography, I bought a new, unmodified, Canon 600D body for use with telephoto lenses. Testing on an EOS-5D, we see that it's sharpness is almost as good wide open in the corners as on the EOS-20D with its smaller sensor. Well, for me. Not only does the Rokinon 135 add additional reach, but I can also now shoot at F/2, instead of F/4 on the Canon. Its actually kind of neat to watch! It is really thanks to another commentator pointing out something that finally makes sense out of this mess: This article is by someone who just got his first first telephoto ever, and is writing about how he feels when he is trying it out. The 135mm focal length is absolutely perfect for the Heart and Soul Nebulae if youre using a crop sensor DSLR camera. Otherwise I might not achieve focus? The lenses I selected are all affordable prime lenses, easily available on the second-hand market, and adaptable to the EOS system. Has a good weight to it. Now - THAT's a lens everyone should have ;). Unfortunately it is not manufactured in a multicoated version, and produces prominent internal reflection artifacts on very bright stars. The lens hood is not petal-shaped, which is great news for those using this lens for astrophotography. Agreed. Great question Scott I think it depends on the image. Looking forward to allow purchasing the Canon 200mm f/2.8L II USM. Backwards compatible (film). My canon is clear modded and I use a an Astronomik EOS-clip L filter to block the uv and ir. http://www.idyll.com/laneysat That is kind of the point I am trying to make -- These pictures are really not in another league. I put quotes around the ones that are written on the lens. When stopped down to 37mm, F5.4, it is almost identical to the Takumar except that on highly enlarged images it shows a hint of coma in the distant corners. The 135mm f2 is by all accounts one of their better and more reliable lenses however I believe the chance of a defective lens is lower with the Canon. The only downside with that lens is that it is manual focus, which might not be suitable for photographing sports or children. The foolproof image seems to be more a case of how a bright fuzzy cluttered moving background can completely detach from the offset dark subject matter and overwhelm it. At under 900USD, it's a steal. Image quality is great, it is tack-sharp wide-open even though for partraiture, a little bit of softness is needed. It's not the most versatile lens, but it's very great for tight portrait shoots; background blur is creamy IMO; one of the best 'bokeh' lens. Together they still weight less than any modern 135mm :>. In my test, nikon have the same color correction than Canon and same sharpness. Such "full spectrum" cameras are somewhat more sensitive in the ultraviolet, but much more sensitive in the deep red and infrared. It's an ideal portrait lens. I have just acquired my astrophotography set up thanks to all your videos and doing some research. Great looking lens, if you ever saw it from the front. I think the readers would welcome contributions from other members' experiences. This is a very practical way to plan your next astrophotography project, and especially handy when using a wide field lens like the Rokinon 135mm F/2. As I posted on the Petapixel variant of this article, cropping a 85/1.4 shot to a 135mm-equivalent FoV gives you approx. You currently have javascript disabled. Otherwise this lens is absolutely incredible. This leaves you with a buttery bokeh and an object in perfect focus. The image is a 90-second exposure at ISO 400 using a Canon EOS 60Da. I also find the other photos not very good. I don't know about other photographers but I do not have many applications for this focal length. Thus the enthusiasm has a valid basis but may not be suitable for all shooting conditions. And they like circles (no ellipses or polygons) and smooth colour (no hard edges, no onion rings). Before I go any further, Id like to share a photo from Gabriel Millou of the Andromeda Galaxy using a Canon 1300D. While there are certainly pricey 135mm F2 lenses out there (such as the aforementioned Sigma 135mm F1.8 Art, or the Carl Zeiss 135mm) there are a couple that give you extreme value for the money. The Nikon D810A, however, is modified for astrophotography out of the box. Maybe try a 400mm f/2.0 to see it that one's got enough blur. I loved the Nikon 80-400G for a year, or so, and then found everything with it wrong, and got rid of it. I think they are an outstanding value for any wide-field astrophotographer, and are particularly suitable for newcomers. What's it got and what's it like to use? When you shoot a 135mm F2 lens at F2, your subject will stand out in this beautiful way, often without much work needed from you as the photographer. I've done comparisons between my brand-new Samyang 85/1.4 and the old big Apollo 135/1.8 lens I had lying around, and the shots were for all practical purposes identical (exept, obviously, for the pixel count once cropped). Mr Ericsson makes a very good point, and to go and dig irrelevant background info on him to discredit him is just well THAT is trolling. We always expect to see some drop in performance (particularly corner sharpness) when we move from testing on a sub-frame to a full-frame camera, but the 135mm f/2L turned in a really remarkable performance even at full-frame. You can barely tell it's a pond.#3: Duck.Birds with bokeh are fine. SharpStar Askar ACL200 200-mm f/4 astrographic telephoto lens, Astrotrac 360 tracking platform first impression, FIELD TEST: CARL ZEISS APOCHROMATIC & SHARPEST (CZAS) BINOVIEWER, Deus_Ex_Mamiya and Michael Covington like this. This is one of the sharpest lens i've ever owned. Light weight and robust. I agree to some extent with many of the critics of the article and disagree with much of its content, but I also have respect for the the author's right to express those opinions. Some reviewers have listed lack of IS as a "Con". As it is it is earns a 9. The Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC lens. Sure, that would be swellbut it doesn't matter with regard to how it performs. We have come to accept that most lenses are strong in only one or two of these three factors, that I personally focus on when researching lenses to buy. Film Friday: DPRTV reviews Fujifilm's Acros II film, Fujifilm launches Instax Mini 12 instant camera, DPReview March Madness, vote for your champions, Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM sample gallery (DPReview TV), OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro sample gallery, Live from Japan: Highlights from CP+ 2023, Retro Review: 24 years later, the Sony F505 is still pretty cool, Hands on with the OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro, New FAA rules make it easier for recreational drone pilots to fly in restricted US airspaces, Leica marks James Bond's 60th* with a special edition D-Lux 7, Film Friday: A closer look at the Pentax KX, an original K-mount SLR, Blackmagic Design announces a new Studio Camera 6K Pro, National Geographic selects Pictures of the Year photo contest winner, Sigma brings DC DN APS-C primes to Nikon Z-mount, Panasonic Lumix S 14-28mm F4-5.6 Macro sample gallery, Tamron announces 11-20mm F2.8 ultra-wide zoom for Fujifilm X-mount, Film Friday: DPReview TV steps back in time to shoot APS film, Finer Points: Here's an easy way to improve video autofocus, DPReview TV: One simple fix to improve video autofocus, Head-to-head: Adobe Super Resolution vs. ON1 Resize AI vs. Topaz Labs Gigapixel AI, Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom.